Closed Thread
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 83
Like Tree28Likes

Thread: Thinking through xp lock change... disaster for RIFT?

  1. #61
    Ascendant mo0trix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,771

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pricia View Post
    The reason I disagree is because if the people who exp locked end up quitting over this, it's not a big loss. They didn't contribute to the social aspect of the game at all anyway, if anything, they made it less friendly, IMO, and turned off new players from pvp.
    Nobody will quit over losing it, just like nobody ever quit over having the option.

    Only people XP locking are only playing twinks for a fun alternative to their usual char, which is probably level 50 and raiding regularly.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ahov View Post
    Links = Defiler = Support, not a healer. Nice try, though.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ahov View Post
    Purifier is a utility spec, not a healer.
    ^This guy writes cleric guides and claims chloro is OP. LOL!

  2. #62
    Prophet of Telara Bliter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mo0trix View Post
    Nobody will quit over losing it, just like nobody ever quit over having the option.

    Only people XP locking are only playing twinks for a fun alternative to their usual char, which is probably level 50 and raiding regularly.
    It isn't the old players that are the issue, I do think we will all keep playing either way. What I think though is that new players may be turned off by the lopsidedness twink PvP is. I have seen what twinks can do to the playerbase by hollowing it out. If they ranked it somehow I would say leave it but if its going to be the way it is now, it's just the older and better geared players beating on the naked noobs. That won't grow the base.

  3. #63
    Ascendant
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rabe View Post
    This is exactly the idea/attitude that I fear is ascendent, and will kill Rift. Player retention is about giving choices. Saying hell with pre-50, hell with the pre-50 economy and hell with new players who don't land in the perfect guild. All which saying that pre-50 pvp needn't be worried about...

    Server Merges here we come?

    Why not use better bolster to fix all levels of pvp including low levels. Make some new runes so the grandfathered twinks don't have a large advantage, Make new 50 runes so that "everyone else" has something to do.

    Why not make the game work at all levels so that people make it to 50 with enough enthusiasm to survive the shock of the grind that awaits them there.

    I have been playing for months and I don't have a 50. If I'd felt I needed one to be considered worth paying attention, to I would have left pre-20 and not gotten my year sub. I'd been tweaking my gear and build for months. I really enjoyed last week when I got to stage 6 on a +4 rift solo. Then I died 7 times trying a +5 rift past stage 3. Back to tweaking.

    Don't assume your sense of the game is the only right one. Or you will be playing with yourself, in so many words and ways.

    I think removing choices is bad, and this proposed change is insanely destructive to player investment for the alleged benefit. It may work out, but if your attitude is the operative one, I don't like our odds.
    It isn't my preference, I'm just saying how it is. If you want to make 1-49 more meaningful, then you'd have to convince the devs to make 1 to 49 take a lot longer to progress through. Rift is simply designed to expedite the leveling process. Players, by design, spend a very tiny fraction (somewhere well below of one tenth of one percent) of their time below level 50. I'm not everyone, but on my mage, I made 50 in about 60 hours. I now have 3800 hours logged. That's a 60 to 3740 hour ratio. A casual player can very easily make level 50 in 2-3 weeks time. In MMOs past, that took months unless you did some serious damage to your health by playing 20+ hours per day. Some MMOs even prevented that by making massive boosts to rested XP and non-rested XP gain was so bad that it would take you 8 hours to farm enough XP that would equal 10 minutes of rested XP gain.

    Rift is simply not the kind of game that focuses on lower level content. The leveling curve is very short with all of the game's forward focus centered on the L50 players. I consider myself a hardcore MMO player (I like longer leveling grinds, stat loss on death, lootable corpses in PvP, gear damage/breakage etc). I would like to see more MMOs without the Candyland style of gameplay... but that's not going to happen in Rift and I'm fine with that. I have my other MMOs for a more difficult challenge.
    Last edited by Laeris; 05-30-2012 at 05:31 PM.

  4. #64
    Shield of Telara Kantazo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    745

    Default

    I believe the developers and brainiacs behind the game need to realize that the content between 1-49 (and if the expansion ads 10 levels, then 1-59) needs to be greatly improve and the exp curve needs to be slow down at least at the moment players hit level 39, ad more content with quests that connect areas, for example

    Yesterday I did one of these low quests that I had in the back burner and the quest took me from Sanctum to the North, then more to the North, then to the West, then to the South, it was a fun experience finding areas that I have overlooked in the past. Chains of quests that connect different areas of the game are fun and full of surprises.
    There are not Powers above the Earth, on the Earth or beneath the Earth that can separate us from His love.

  5. #65
    Rift Chaser Shinkirou's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    379

    Default

    OP was a lil tldr as he said, but i tried to get the main point.

    XP locking i consider to be a good idea, but twinking in low level brackets, while annoying, is also bad for the community. A lot of people xp lock in pvp to save up for 50 pvp equipment, because honestly starting the 50 pvp grind, is worse than constantly going up against an army of twinks, the community is NOT large enough for the 50 bracket system, or the system is broken, meaning constant r1s against r40s, a much bigger gap than a 9 lvl difference <50. I have 2 lvl 50s, i also have alts, an undergeared lvl 10 has a better chance against lvl 19 locked characters than my r20 has in most wfs. BUT the thing about xp locking in the lower brackets? It makes new players hate pvp, they hit lvl 10 on their first character, join a warfront, and get slaughtered and lose the warfront before they can really land an attack.

    XP locking provides a lot of options for players, the only problem with it, is locking for pvp, and the lower brackets are the biggest problem. Getting rid of xp locking? Bad idea, this game has already been changed to streamline you to 50, meaning you get there with minimal game experience, minimal gear, and minimal currency. The leveling system was ALREADY SHORTENED, on my first character, i needed about 3x the experience you need now, seems that was changed sometime during my couple months without internet last summer? Anyway, right now people are hitting 50 with crap to their name, they try to pvp? Against people with twice their stats, try to pve? No one wants to run with them because of a lack of gear and experience. If 1-49 is meaningless, get rid of it, rushing people through it just screws up their endgame experience.

    XP locking should stay, and Trion should figure out a way to prevent it from being a problem, i don't care if it's separate wfs for locked characters, but right now 1-49 is screwed, which makes 50 screwed as well. My first 49 needed almost 1.5mil xp to 50, now you need like 450k? If you want people to rush to 50 in a few days fine, their loss, but the players that want to learn the game and know wtf they're doing, need something.
    IGN: Abyssinion : 60
    IGN: Shinkirou : 60
    Guild: Just Carried You
    Server: Seastone

  6. #66
    Soulwalker
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    9

    Default

    I've skimmed through this entire thread and with mentoring available I don't see one valid excuse to keep XP locking. Period. Good riddance. Mentoring may not be a perfect solution but it will be leaps and bounds better than what we have now. Anyone who leaves the game will be someone we didn't want to have around anyway. And as for the economy there will be changes but after the ebb and flow i seriously doubt that anything substantial will happen. There will always be ways to generate moolah. Heck, I wish there were more ways to SPEND it.

  7. #67
    Rift Disciple
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Henri Blanche View Post
    I've skimmed through this entire thread and with mentoring available I don't see one valid excuse to keep XP locking. Period. Good riddance. Mentoring may not be a perfect solution but it will be leaps and bounds better than what we have now. Anyone who leaves the game will be someone we didn't want to have around anyway. And as for the economy there will be changes but after the ebb and flow i seriously doubt that anything substantial will happen. There will always be ways to generate moolah. Heck, I wish there were more ways to SPEND it.
    Actually for a game that has only 250k subs you want to keep everyone that you can. I do not XP lock i lvl through pvp and at every level i try to get the best for my char. I use my 3 other mains to gather, craft, augment, rune, i move essences through boa sigils and trade marks for planarite. And the only time i have fun in a WF is when i run into twinks on the other end.
    Cause also just going through scores of green geared chars who have no idea what to do in a WZ is not fun at all.
    And yes once i am done with this char i will quit. I would have stayed if i could make twinks later on for diferent brackets and enjoy a bit of low lvl pvp but without it there is nothing left. I was in a top lvl raiding guild we cleared HK among the first on my shard. They are gone, look at the top guilds from 6 moths ago... they are gone as well. PvE only and a bug one at that does not keep players playing a game for to long. people need other things to do, gathering and crafting are useless as there is no items better than a master mode item. PVP is useless as after you get to rank 8 or what is it now 40 there is nothing left... There is no Arenas or competitive WZs...
    Taking twinking out will ruin this game for a lot more people than you think, and with conquest being a big fail a lot of the pvp community will in fact leave (what little is left). So next time you say you dont want those people here, remember that you are in a fairly small community and cant really afford to bleed out any more people if you can prevent it.

  8. #68
    Ascendant mo0trix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,771

    Default

    Removing the level lock is fine as long as:

    Mentoring your level down allows you to enter lower level WFs.
    Gear that fall under or equal to the mentoring level still equate to full stats.

    The 2nd point I make is because I tried instant adventures on the PTS whilst mentoring myself down... it automatically made me level 12. At level 50 I have 2249 SP... at level 12, I had... 65! So the gear I was wearing was actually worse than what you can acquire at level 12 and i'd rather be rocking some decent low level gear to farm IAs than taking just as long to kill level 13 mobs than it takes me to kill level 52s in EI (bad English there I think but meh).

    One great thing about the mentoring system would be going back to level 45 (wish 49 was an option though) so I could farm warfronts on my rank 4 warrior, without just getting smashed to pieces over and over.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ahov View Post
    Links = Defiler = Support, not a healer. Nice try, though.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ahov View Post
    Purifier is a utility spec, not a healer.
    ^This guy writes cleric guides and claims chloro is OP. LOL!

  9. #69
    Shield of Telara
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaal View Post
    for a thread thinking through the effect of XP lock you didn't think very far. XP lock is being replaced by mentoring, this will allow players to scale themselves to any level they want. .
    I just wish they'd make it compulsory the way GW2 will.

    Low level events are ruined by a few level 50s nuking the boss in seconds before the players at the actual zone level can even get there.


    XP lock will lose more subs than removing it. It ruins low level pvp which is the only place decent pvp happens with the state of max level gear dependant pvp in this game.
    Last edited by zetans; 06-06-2012 at 05:30 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Omega326 View Post
    While we're making wild accusations without any backup, I'm going to go ahead and say that you are a 12 year old horse named Suzy that lives in a crater on the moon... and I am absolutely correct.

  10. #70
    Ascendant Charlice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    4,970

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Henri Blanche View Post
    I've skimmed through this entire thread and with mentoring available I don't see one valid excuse to keep XP locking. Period. Good riddance. Mentoring may not be a perfect solution but it will be leaps and bounds better than what we have now. Anyone who leaves the game will be someone we didn't want to have around anyway. And as for the economy there will be changes but after the ebb and flow i seriously doubt that anything substantial will happen. There will always be ways to generate moolah. Heck, I wish there were more ways to SPEND it.
    You can't mentor in warfronts. PERIOD.

    Mentoring is PvE ONLY.


    Den of Madness | Greybriar | Den of Badness | Derpwood

    Quote Originally Posted by Daglar View Post
    No, its not what Daglar said yesterday.

    ~Daglar

  11. #71
    Rift Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirantor View Post
    Actually for a game that has only 250k subs you want to keep everyone that you can. I do not XP lock i lvl through pvp and at every level i try to get the best for my char. I use my 3 other mains to gather, craft, augment, rune, i move essences through boa sigils and trade marks for planarite. And the only time i have fun in a WF is when i run into twinks on the other end.
    Cause also just going through scores of green geared chars who have no idea what to do in a WZ is not fun at all.
    And yes once i am done with this char i will quit. I would have stayed if i could make twinks later on for diferent brackets and enjoy a bit of low lvl pvp but without it there is nothing left. I was in a top lvl raiding guild we cleared HK among the first on my shard. They are gone, look at the top guilds from 6 moths ago... they are gone as well. PvE only and a bug one at that does not keep players playing a game for to long. people need other things to do, gathering and crafting are useless as there is no items better than a master mode item. PVP is useless as after you get to rank 8 or what is it now 40 there is nothing left... There is no Arenas or competitive WZs...
    Taking twinking out will ruin this game for a lot more people than you think, and with conquest being a big fail a lot of the pvp community will in fact leave (what little is left). So next time you say you dont want those people here, remember that you are in a fairly small community and cant really afford to bleed out any more people if you can prevent it.
    Did this thread really need to be revived? Besides, rift isn't a pvp game, and level locking is unnatural. You wanna go be a big bad twink, I suggest fiesta online, but once every couple days you'll have to die a 50+ times to keep your level down

  12. #72
    Rift Disciple
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by the_real_seebs View Post
    The only reason I advocated for XP lock was the need to have it in order to do quests before they went grey. Mentoring solves this well enough.
    I laughed at this. Why lock for greying quests? So you can get XP? Oh wait..

    Mentoring doesn't replace XP Lock. I think XP Lock was more of a RP mechanic to try to get back some of the immersion Trion tries so hard to steal from us. Now lowbie content won't matter until you hit 50 and can Mentor down to do it properly. Makes sense.

    Anyways, farewell to XP Lock. Maybe all the crying about twinks won't eat up so much bandwidth now and we'll get less server lag.

  13. #73
    Ascendant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,688

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaal View Post
    all the stuff you said about having the pre-50 economy being ruined may be correct but its not going to affect rift. There will still be players who are leveling alts that will buy crafted gear..
    I would argue they won't, if they're leveling alts they may well have already got crafter(s) able to make that gear themselves or are more likely to be in a guild with guildies that can make it. I don't think alt-levelers are any large proportion of AH customers.

  14. #74
    Plane Touched Zomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Asterisk42 View Post
    I laughed at this. Why lock for greying quests? So you can get XP? Oh wait..
    Keeping a chance that maybe, if you do too many mistakes, you might die? Of course, that means stopping long before the quests turn grey, when they are still at the same level as you, or higher.

    Some people only do quests for the improvement that gives to the character. But some, and they are not that few, actually do quests because they enjoy the doing, rather than just the outcome. That part typically goes away completely when outleveling the quest too much.
    Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

  15. #75
    Ascendant Pork Star's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,468

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirantor View Post
    Actually for a game that has only 250k subs you want to keep everyone that you can.
    Yes, they are only bringing in 2 or 3 million dollars a month in subscriptions, their business model is failing so hard! I'm very sure that soon the company will go under. What a shame, WoW will be the only MMO again.

Closed Thread
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts