Closed Thread
Page 204 of 288 FirstFirst ... 104 154 194 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 214 254 ... LastLast
Results 3,046 to 3,060 of 4308
Like Tree490Likes

  Click here to go to the first Rift Team post in this thread.   Thread: AP Scaling and other DPS changes to the Warrior going up to PTS

  1. #3046
    MiO
    MiO is offline
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pajac1 View Post
    or asking for buffs to 2H!

    Good luck with that one xD

  2. #3047
    Telaran Wildwalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by intrinsc View Post
    Atrius: DW is still far too high above any 2H build on PTS. Please fix.
    I agree. Please nerf DW to bring it back in line.

  3. #3048
    Prophet of Telara Havors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,145

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mist26 View Post
    I have to say I disagree with a lot of your posts, mostly due to how the tone of your posts come across, but this is a good idea.

    It would set a baseline to start at with no RNG trinkets affecting the overall outcome.
    Ive been saying this for ages! we need a common baseline to perform accurate parses. Some have lots of PA some dont.. some use consumables, some dont... some have raid buffs, some dont... some use T2 gear some dont.....

    Sort it out Trion! Do you want actual effective testing or just people playing on the PTS to see whats new?

    that is all.
    World First - Cyril Kalmar Kill
    eXile-Corp 11/11 HK - 8/8 ID - 4/4 FT - 5/5 EE

  4. #3049
    Telaran
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    60

    Default

    I see nothing wrong with parsing in whatever Live (no ID gear or t3 PA) gear/pa you have and just listing what you use. There are enough parses listed that disparities would be easy to understand. oh that guy has relic and he doesn't? that difference makes sense.

    Most of this is being asked for people who don't have the time, or worse, the lazy people being spoon fed numbers they have to understand in 5 seconds of looking at or they won't like it. Anyone who takes the time to look over multiple parses or tests themselves knows how the state of the dps looks like. I'm sure Atrius and the other devs take everything into account, not just a 5 second glance at end result #s.

    point is, parse in w/e live gear you got, just make important info known, easy enough.

  5. #3050
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Durango View Post
    my numbers are perfectly accurate. They were done with the same gear level and same pa level in a full raid setup. The DPS clustering of warriors, mages, rogues, and clerics were tight as well with each class having a dps range of <100 within the class with the same specs.

    I would suggest that other guilds get on equal gear level and equal PA levels and parse. And yes, that means if rogues are using relic 1hdrs then warriors should be as well. Equalize on either full T1 or full T2 PAs. And yes, that means an incredibly long time clicking PAs. They really need a shift-click option for PAs.
    If your having these finding's then All I can say is ur rogues and mages have a L2play issue.. Cause when we parse in BB we def don't have that problem you do.
    Shunn-Warrior l Tabula Rasa l TODQ 4/4 l FT 4/4
    EE 5/5
    Asbell-mage
    FT 4/4 l EE 4/5 (Alt run)

  6. #3051
    Sword of Telara
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XxShunsuixX View Post
    If your having these finding's then All I can say is ur rogues and mages have a L2play issue.. Cause when we parse in BB we def don't have that problem you do.
    Agree with this.

    Durango - Please post the parse that you claim you had sent to the developer. If warriors are indeed parsing 500+ above others, it needs to be toned down. No rationale raider wants huge discrepencies across classes hence it would help us understand where you are coming from and see where does it compare with the numerous other parses in this 300 page thread.

  7. #3052
    RIFT Guide Writer Valthirus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    990

    Default

    @ Atrius

    If you want DW and 2h to be both viable you need to have one designated as the superior ST/AOE spec.

    DW should be 300+ ahead in ST and 2h should be ahead in AOE like it is now (or vice versa).

    TY - JUST WANTED TO PUT THAT OUT THERE

  8. #3053
    Ascendant
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,468

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackblade View Post
    Agree with this.

    Durango - Please post the parse that you claim you had sent to the developer. If warriors are indeed parsing 500+ above others, it needs to be toned down. No rationale raider wants huge discrepencies across classes hence it would help us understand where you are coming from and see where does it compare with the numerous other parses in this 300 page thread.
    The problem is that it is already in the hands of the only people that matter: the devs. It was done in the only way that matters for cross class balance: at equal PA and equal gear in a full raid setting. There is little point in most of the parses that have been posted here except for intra-class comparison. I'm sure that several guilds will do parses on the PTS with equal gear and equal PAs in full raid settings and these will also be submitted to the devs.

    The net result will hopefully be targets buffs/debuff of various classes to get the DPS in line across classes. The biggest outlier right now btw is cleric DPS specs that are between 900-1000 DPS behind warriors.

    Me posting parses here won't really accomplish anything. If you are curious, get your guild on PTS, get in equiv gear and settle upon equiv PAs, and parse in a full raid with all buffs/debuffs and all consumables. Then submit the full logs of the parses along with snaps of the raid DPS breakdowns, decided gear level (T1, T2, T3 BiS), and standardized PA level (T1, T2, T3) to the devs. The more people parsing on PTS in equiv gear levels and equiv PA levels with a full raid and submitting the full logs to the devs, the better. Whether you end up also posting your parses here or not doesn't really matter, this is just a forum and anything without a full combat log isn't that useful overall.

  9. #3054
    Plane Touched WilkesW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Valthirus View Post
    @ Atrius

    If you want DW and 2h to be both viable you need to have one designated as the superior ST/AOE spec.

    DW should be 300+ ahead in ST and 2h should be ahead in AOE like it is now (or vice versa).

    TY - JUST WANTED TO PUT THAT OUT THERE
    Thank you for highlighting this!
    This is needed to make both setups equally used IMO
    Last edited by WilkesW; 03-29-2012 at 02:18 AM.

  10. #3055
    Telaran
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WilkesW View Post
    Thank you for highlighting this!
    This is needed to make both setups equally used IMO
    Why not make both equally good so you let the weapon drops decide whatever build you choose?

  11. #3056
    Ascendant intrinsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Warminster, PA
    Posts
    5,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fruktan View Post
    Why not make both equally good so you let the weapon drops decide whatever build you choose?
    lol

  12. #3057
    RIFT Guide Writer Valthirus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    990

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fruktan View Post
    Why not make both equally good so you let the weapon drops decide whatever build you choose?
    That would be nice, but it would require a reworking of DW... The AOE is dwarfed by 2h.

  13. #3058
    Sword of Telara
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Valthirus View Post
    That would be nice, but it would require a reworking of DW... The AOE is dwarfed by 2h.
    Inb4 PFalcon teaching you how to AoE with PoTH.

  14. #3059
    Ascendant intrinsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Warminster, PA
    Posts
    5,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackblade View Post
    Inb4 PFalcon teaching you how to AoE with PoTH.
    PFalcon is the ultimate warrior, don't you know?

  15. #3060
    RIFT Guide Writer Sekhmet The Fierce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by intrinsc View Post
    PFalcon is the ultimate warrior, don't you know?
    He's my internet hero <3

    I even got a poster...
    "Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund auch in dich hinein."
    He who fights with Monsters should look to it that He himself does not become a Monster. And when you gaze long into an Abyss, the Abyss also gazes into you.
    Friedrich Nietzsche

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts