Closed Thread
Page 196 of 288 FirstFirst ... 96 146 186 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 206 246 ... LastLast
Results 2,926 to 2,940 of 4308
Like Tree490Likes

  Click here to go to the first Rift Team post in this thread.   Thread: AP Scaling and other DPS changes to the Warrior going up to PTS

  1. #2926
    Ascendant intrinsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Warminster, PA
    Posts
    5,651

    Default

    I'd like to see the 1 chloro parse.

  2. #2927
    Ascendant
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,669

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steelwind View Post
    Except Atrius balanced 1.8 based on 3x chloro parse.
    Please, explain to me what 3x chloros even means? Everyone gets the same 10% damage increase. So if he balanced it based on 3x chloros, it would be the same as if balancing on 1x chloro or 10x chloro or 20x chloro.

    Do you not understand this?

  3. #2928
    Ascendant intrinsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Warminster, PA
    Posts
    5,651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rizaz View Post
    Please, explain to me what 3x chloros even means? Everyone gets the same 10% damage increase. So if he balanced it based on 3x chloros, it would be the same as if balancing on 1x chloro or 10x chloro or 20x chloro.

    Do you not understand this?
    I think what he means is that if anyone uses 3 chloros to cycling wild growth to bump their numbers up to where another class would have with just 1 chloro then that one class using 3 chloro's would be nerfed back unnecessarily and when they use 1 chloro with new numbers won't match the class using 1 chloro to parse. Unless, your 3x chloro parse did, indeed, have mages and rogues parsing similar to you. In which case I see no problem because those other 2 callings will reap the same benefits.

  4. #2929
    Ascendant
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,669

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by intrinsc View Post
    I think what he means is that if anyone uses 3 chloros to cycling wild growth to bump their numbers up to where another class would have with just 1 chloro then that one class using 3 chloro's would be nerfed back unnecessarily and when they use 1 chloro with new numbers won't match the class using 1 chloro to parse. Unless, your 3x chloro parse did, indeed, have mages and rogues parsing similar to you. In which case I see no problem because those other 2 callings will reap the same benefits.
    This was a raid parse. The mages and rogues had the same 3x wild growth or 1x wild growth.

  5. #2930
    RIFT Guide Writer Sebb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    4,639

    Default

    For all the people QQing about champion AOE:

    I did some aoe parsing on the dummy:

    51 Para/15rb dw - 1k per target
    51 rb/15para dw - 1k per target
    44 para/20ch/2rb dw - 0.9k per target
    51ch/15rb - 1.3k 2h - 1.3k per target, probably a little bit more since the dummies didn't have enough life for a BF crit.
    Seb - R40 OP PVP Warrior
    Solo Tanking Akylios - But I hate tanking Plutonus.
    New WF Idea for Rift
    SAVE THE VK!!!

  6. #2931
    Shield of Telara gfiz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    727

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rizaz View Post
    Please, explain to me what 3x chloros even means? Everyone gets the same 10% damage increase. So if he balanced it based on 3x chloros, it would be the same as if balancing on 1x chloro or 10x chloro or 20x chloro.

    Do you not understand this?
    yea...but did you give him their parses, or just yours? Because I think that's what some are trying to say, albeit poorly, is that the reaction was to your "raid parse", which isn't a typical raid by any stretch with 3 chloro's, and the concern I believe is that would give a false sense of a typical "raid parse".

  7. #2932
    RIFT Guide Writer Sebb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    4,639

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by intrinsc View Post
    I think what he means is that if anyone uses 3 chloros to cycling wild growth to bump their numbers up to where another class would have with just 1 chloro then that one class using 3 chloro's would be nerfed back unnecessarily and when they use 1 chloro with new numbers won't match the class using 1 chloro to parse. Unless, your 3x chloro parse did, indeed, have mages and rogues parsing similar to you. In which case I see no problem because those other 2 callings will reap the same benefits.
    But it doesn't matter what # dps people were getting as much as the fact that the warriors were higher than everyone else.
    Seb - R40 OP PVP Warrior
    Solo Tanking Akylios - But I hate tanking Plutonus.
    New WF Idea for Rift
    SAVE THE VK!!!

  8. #2933
    Plane Touched
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    271

    Default

    No the important thing to note here is" Do not take an epeen guilds parses seriously ever"

  9. #2934
    Shield of Telara gfiz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    727

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sebb View Post
    But it doesn't matter what # dps people were getting as much as the fact that the warriors were higher than everyone else.

    And if Atrius was actually taking rogue and mage metrics from us as well, then you would have a point.

  10. #2935
    Ascendant Steelwind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rizaz View Post
    Please, explain to me what 3x chloros even means? Everyone gets the same 10% damage increase. So if he balanced it based on 3x chloros, it would be the same as if balancing on 1x chloro or 10x chloro or 20x chloro.

    Do you not understand this?
    Wild Growth is a 60s cooldown with a 12s duration. Using 3 Chloros meant that you got a 10% buff for 24s longer than a true raid parse per minute. Everyone who parsed during this 3 chloro setup had their dps numbers increased.

    It was obvious that Atrius balanced 1.8 based on these results. Because they compared their results in which they more than likely used 1 chloro for their tests. They compared a 1 chloro parse to your 3 chloro parse and determined that a nerf was necessary.

    Will you please post your 1 chloro parse so that Atrius can see the difference? Thank you.
    Last edited by Steelwind; 03-27-2012 at 05:12 PM.
    Steelwind Guardian Warrior
    DIVINE FURY Guild Laethys Server 4/4 TotDQ 4/4 FT 4/5 EE
    Storm Legion 2.2 61 Riftblade Guide
    Storm Legion 2.2 61 Tempest Guide

  11. #2936
    Ascendant
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,669

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steelwind View Post
    Wild Growth is a 60s cooldown with a 12s duration. Using 3 Chloros meant that you got a 10% buff for 24s longer than a true raid parse per minute. Everyone who parsed during this 3 chloro setup had their dps numbers increased.

    It was obvious that Atrius balanced 1.8 based on these results. Because they compared their results in which they more than likely used 1 chloro for their tests. They compared a 1 chloro parse to your 3 chloro parse and determined that a nerf was necessary.

    Will you please post your 1 chloro parse so that Atrius can see the difference? Thank you.

    http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/5962/lolcoa.jpg

  12. #2937
    Sword of Telara
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    856

    Default

    This whole massive conspiracy theory thing a lot of you are spouting off is insane. Give me a break

    Rizaz already stated those were raid parses. The whole parse was turned in showing all the classes

    Whether they used 1 chloro or 3 or 0 or 20 was irrelevant.

    Now can we please drop this stupidity and get back on track. Put parses up or ideas on how to actually fix warrior dps a bit more on 2h and balance things out the best it can be (which I know won't ever be completely perfect)

    As long as the specs are within 10% of each other I'm pretty happy, which I believe was the old metric people always wanted. 5% would be even better, but if we can get around that point I don't think anyone should really complain unless they are the biggest nitpickers you can find, as it'll all come down to which type of weapon u want to use then and how fast you get upgrades for it
    Drakkars - Warrior - Warcry - Faeblight
    Guild Leader
    4/4 TotDQ, 4/4 FT 4/5 EE

  13. #2938
    Rift Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    696

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gargoyles View Post
    No the important thing to note here is" Do not take an epeen guilds parses seriously ever"
    I just feel like atrius should have tested this himself instead of going nerf trigger happy and breaking specs and just making rash decisions based off of unrealistic parses. A few warriors shouldnt make the whole warrior community suffer because they were eager to display how elite they are.

  14. #2939
    Ascendant Soulsurfing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,661

    Default

    Thank you for the clarification.
    TODQ 4/4 FT 4/4 EE 5/5, Warlord
    EE & FT Conq, 3/4 HM's

  15. #2940
    Ascendant intrinsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Warminster, PA
    Posts
    5,651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rizaz View Post
    This was a raid parse. The mages and rogues had the same 3x wild growth or 1x wild growth.
    Yeah, that makes a ton more sense. I think people saw your parse, with no one else, and thought it was you by yourself and no one else on the overall parse.

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts