Closed Thread
Page 141 of 288 FirstFirst ... 41 91 131 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 151 191 241 ... LastLast
Results 2,101 to 2,115 of 4308
Like Tree490Likes

  Click here to go to the first Rift Team post in this thread.   Thread: AP Scaling and other DPS changes to the Warrior going up to PTS

  1. #2101
    Champion
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sekhmet The Fierce View Post
    Well, there goes the 51CH/15RB build and the 44Para build might as well go full 22 Champ since the 2 point RB finisher is now on the GCD. My first comment is that this will nerf various builds due to GCD finishers not being upto par with oGCD ones. The change, as commented on, has reduced the synergy of deep Champion with other souls.

    As for the CD on Fiery Burst, this still won't make a difference to rotations, since the duration is 10 seconds. To maximise every tick, you wouldn't want this macro'd anyway. However, target switching and placing multiple fiery bursts on a target can't happen any more (though kinda difficult to pull off effectively).

    Looks like I'll be parsing again sometime to see how this plays out.
    DW 51RB destroyed too, but 44/22 paragon/champion now top ST dps spec and have ST dps similar 40/26 champ/BM ;)

    P.S. Cruel but necessary changes, imho there was no other way to make gcd finishers usable
    Last edited by Ekso; 03-21-2012 at 02:56 AM.
    GSB/DD/DH/RoS/RotP/HK conqueror, ultimate dungeon hero

  2. #2102
    Ascendant
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,953

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ekso View Post
    DW 51RB destroyed too, but 44/22 paragon/champion now top ST dps spec and have ST dps similar 40/26 champ/BM ;)

    P.S. Cruel but necessary changes, imho there was no other way to make gcd finishers usable
    I would have rather they made all finishers oGCD and lowered their damage to balance than force us to use on-GCD finishers.
    Maza the Mage <Damaged PvPness>
    Not playing a warrior anymore because it's boring.
    11/11 HK | 4/4 ROTP | 0/8 ID

  3. #2103
    Champion
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunt55511 View Post
    I would have rather they made all finishers oGCD and lowered their damage to balance than force us to use on-GCD finishers.
    Without this changes warriors have highest ST dps on PTS, top mage with 120k attuments and full relic gear have only 3-3.1k ST dps on dummy, warriors without this changes have 3.4k+ ;) with AoE dps build - 51Champ/15 RB
    GSB/DD/DH/RoS/RotP/HK conqueror, ultimate dungeon hero

  4. #2104
    Plane Touched Fiala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    253

    Default The REAL problem is the GCD itself as finishers go

    Playing with GCD finishers is VERY clunky and more so with a melee class like a warrior. The problem is magnified in PvP when every second is critical to killing or dying. Unlike the other three classes, we don't have the LUXURY of RANGE NOR STEALTH !

    That's a problem Atrius has NOT found an answer to at all. In fact he's gone the complete opposite direction..creating more problems than answers as far as PvP goes.

    As others have pointed out, it's also destroying the synergy between trees. You can't use many Paragon abilities with 2H or even 1H/shield. Now you can't even use some Champion abilities with Riftblade. What the heck is Trion doing ? They promised there'd be synergy between the trees..sure it works well for ANY other class. EXCEPT WARRIORS. And they're going in the OPPOSITE DIRECTION by making the trees less..and less..and LESS synergized over time with the Warrior classes.
    Last edited by Fiala; 03-21-2012 at 03:17 AM.

  5. #2105
    Shadowlander
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    40

    Default

    But that same Mage parses just as high as a Warrior Raid buffed. If i remember that parse correct even 70dps more....

  6. #2106
    Rift Disciple
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ekso View Post
    DW 51RB destroyed too, but 44/22 paragon/champion now top ST dps spec and have ST dps similar 40/26 champ/BM ;)

    P.S. Cruel but necessary changes, imho there was no other way to make gcd finishers usable
    It wasn't nesessary to do away with oGCD finishers in rotatoins altogether, in the process killing 3 viable and fun specs and leaving PvP essentially without a ranged finisher. If our DPS needed a neft (questionable at best), it could have been accomplished by lowering Icy Burst's damage by x amount per tick. Same could have been done in order to make GCD finishers more desirable, or they could have been tweaked upward individually.

    This was nothing but a lazy way out, without much consideration for the consequences... well now, there's a surprise.

  7. #2107
    MiO
    MiO is offline
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    597

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ekso View Post
    DW 51RB destroyed too

    That is yet to be seen. All that need be done is making Icy Assault work in a similar fashion as RW. Where it has a damage calc for DW and 2h.

  8. #2108
    Telaran
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    77

    Default

    The change to Destroyer's only triggering of Physical attacks it not needed. The only thing it does is screw with synergy.
    Icy being changed to onGCD fixes the issues of offGCD abilities be a little over powered but removes a play style that people like.
    I'm guessing you have a dmg per energy calculation, that's why offGCD finishers cost more. You also know what dps you want warriors doing. Play with those two things so you can make them even. Maybe increase the cost of offGCD finishers or reduce the dmg they do so things balance out.

  9. #2109
    Ascendant
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,013

    Default

    51 champ won't go down without a fight.
    We need a deathblow dummy.
    Icy burst was a liability, as fun and as smooth as that spec was.

    In the future, devs should attempt to design all top specs to run as smoothly as the 51 champ did running icy bursts.

    If they would take all the finishers OGCD and nerf their power instead of boosting their power insanely to justify the delay to activate it compared to OGCD finishers, we'd honestly be having more fun playing all the rotations.

    I agree 100% that specs that use GCD finishers are boring as hell compared to those that don't. Paragon's friggin killing me right now. I don't care if reaping harvest hits for 5500.

  10. #2110
    Ascendant
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,013

    Default

    Also, is there any chance we can get paired strike to be a 20m ability instead of melee range and path of the wind to be straight 1 second GCD ability instead of 4s?
    Paragon needs a little attention in the ranged department. No need to make it remotely competitive with ranged classes, but what little warrior ranged capability we had in 1.7 got hit pretty hard with these recent changes.

    Since subbing riftblade is to be severely discouraged these days, paragon runs clunky as hell from ranged without spears and OGCDs.

  11. #2111
    Ascendant
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,953

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PFalcon View Post
    51 champ won't go down without a fight.
    We need a deathblow dummy.
    Icy burst was a liability, as fun and as smooth as that spec was.

    In the future, devs should attempt to design all top specs to run as smoothly as the 51 champ did running icy bursts.

    If they would take all the finishers OGCD and nerf their power instead of boosting their power insanely to justify the delay to activate it compared to OGCD finishers, we'd honestly be having more fun playing all the rotations.

    I agree 100% that specs that use GCD finishers are boring as hell compared to those that don't. Paragon's friggin killing me right now. I don't care if reaping harvest hits for 5500.
    The current state of warrior souls on the PTS right now makes me cry. Anywho, back to my mage I go, I guess.
    Maza the Mage <Damaged PvPness>
    Not playing a warrior anymore because it's boring.
    11/11 HK | 4/4 ROTP | 0/8 ID

  12. #2112
    Sword of Telara
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunt55511 View Post
    The current state of warrior souls on the PTS right now makes me cry. Anywho, back to my mage I go, I guess.
    Are the changes up yet?

  13. #2113
    Ascendant
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,953

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackblade View Post
    Are the changes up yet?
    Dunno, but literally every build requires the use of on-GCD finishers now, which kills any joy left in warrior DPS for me.
    Last edited by Hunt55511; 03-21-2012 at 04:27 AM.
    Maza the Mage <Damaged PvPness>
    Not playing a warrior anymore because it's boring.
    11/11 HK | 4/4 ROTP | 0/8 ID

  14. #2114
    Champion
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackblade View Post
    Are the changes up yet?
    Nope changes still aren't present on PTS
    GSB/DD/DH/RoS/RotP/HK conqueror, ultimate dungeon hero

  15. #2115
    Plane Touched WilkesW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    244

    Default

    If this was a "solution" to make warriors parse less without raidbuffs to make casters on par outside raid you probably have succeded, but if these changes stick it will most likely be mages/rogues>warriors in raids.

    And to make rotations hard now we are going to have to split our macros instead of trying to tweak it even further. Its a good thing there's still 3 more weeks of possible changes. For a while I was superhappy with all the possible situational speccs, but now we will end up having 2 probs (1 DW / 1 2h) IF we don't see more changes wich we hopefully will.

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts