Rangers "Eagle Eye" and Assassins "Ruthlessness" (5% crit) not stacking?!

[Grapefruit]

So is this intentionality not stacking and a paper doll bug?

Or most likely a bug that the 2 talents aren't stacking like they should.

[Jekyll03]

So is this intentionality not stacking and a paper doll bug?

Or most likely a bug that the 2 talents aren't stacking like they should.

paper doll bug they shouldn't stack on it.... being able to get flat 10% crit though bottom tier talents does not seem right IMO

[Gertrudes]

hmm.. i think i had bad range in the first tests..

just testet:

5/5/0 (Eagle Eye+Ruthlessness) -> Paperdoll 28,46% -> Parser 26,97%

so both skills ARE stacking like they should

[Dinadass]

Or most likely a bug that the 2 talents aren't stacking like they should.

I'm gonna go with this one. Also I've heard that the +5% hit in Blade Dancer doesn't work correctly either but haven't confirmed that myself.

Yay for the simplest possible talents being broken.

Not saying you're wrong, but I'm struggling to think of any that are not critable (I'm at work), can you give me an example so I don't drive myself crazy....

Serrated Blades ticks comes to mind. Booby Trap too.

[Jekyll03]

hmm.. i think i had bad range in the first tests..

just testet:

5/5/0 (Eagle Eye+Ruthlessness) -> Paperdoll 28,46% -> Parser 26,97%

so both skills ARE stacking like they should

need to run the test for a long time to iron out anomolys... nothing shot of a 20 min test will be accurate on something like this

[Grapefruit]

hmm.. i think i had bad range in the first tests..

just testet:

5/5/0 (Eagle Eye+Ruthlessness) -> Paperdoll 28,46% -> Parser 26,97%

so both skills ARE stacking like they should

I'll run an extended auto attack test later tonight if I have time to try and reproduce. How long are you auto attacking for?

[sano]

I'm gonna go with this one. Also I've heard that the +5% hit in Blade Dancer doesn't work correctly either but haven't confirmed that myself.

Yay for the simplest possible talents being broken.



Serrated Blades ticks comes to mind. Booby Trap too.

I'm pretty sure serrated can, never had booby trap so I can't speak to that, but barbed trap can.

[PessimiStick]

I'm pretty sure serrated can, never had booby trap so I can't speak to that, but barbed trap can.

Booby Trap cannot crit. I always found that dumb.

If you want truly accurate results for a test like this, you need several HOURS of autoattacks.

[Dunharrow]

Uhh, I think you're drunk buddy. This thread is discussing 2 crit talents stacking, only one of which you get in a 51/15 ranger build..... so umm...... what?

You are a moron. He's saying that there is a discussion build about 51 rang/15 nb and people arguing for getting assassin instead of nightblade. In that thread it was proved that NB is better because assassin and ranger crit talents do not stack.

[Grapefruit]

You are a moron. He's saying that there is a discussion build about 51 rang/15 nb and people arguing for getting assassin instead of nightblade. In that thread it was proved that NB is better because assassin and ranger crit talents do not stack.

Is there a link somewhere with this proof? It would help to have more data to look at since this info is a bit inconsistent.

[sano]

You are a moron. He's saying that there is a discussion build about 51 rang/15 nb and people arguing for getting assassin instead of nightblade. In that thread it was proved that NB is better because assassin and ranger crit talents do not stack.

glad he linked to this magical thread....


PS. I'd LOVE to see this "poof"

[Hokonoso]

glad he linked to this magical thread....


PS. I'd LOVE to see this "poof"

http://forums.riftgame.com/showthrea...w-t2-raid-spec

instead of replying to this thread, i hit the back button, spent a total if 4 seconds (as it's on the first page) and copied the link, it's such a big thread, i don't see how you could be reading this section of the forums and not see it.

also i can confirm that the 5% hit talent for bladedancer does indeed work.

[Lakkin]

glad he linked to this magical thread....


PS. I'd LOVE to see this "poof"

Go back to page one and look at the results. Make specs and make your own results. That's all the "proof" you need. If your critting for 5% less than your crit states because you have both tree's and crit from both tree's id say thats proof enough. You don't need a dev post on everything to make it true.

[Jekyll03]

Go back to page one and look at the results. Make specs and make your own results. That's all the "proof" you need. If your critting for 5% less than your crit states because you have both tree's and crit from both tree's id say thats proof enough. You don't need a dev post on everything to make it true.

wise man once said - for those who want to believe something no proof is needed, for those who do not want to believe something no amount of proof is enough

[sano]

Sorry I'm gainfully employed so I have to go on the gross amount of misinformation if I want to kill some time at work. I'll gladly test it when I get home from work, enjoy your Tuesday afternoon!