
Originally Posted by
Jrdp
Well, i think that you must thing about calling someone ignorant..
Maybe that's why so much warriors also use elementals attacks? because armour are usseles?
Maybe assesins, rangers, marksmans use magicals attacks?
Humm, i never see a Riftblade at ranged with sword and shield dishing almost the same damage at ranged than a ranger, nor i saw semi-tanks working thru the opposite team like a scythe topping dps and killing blows and with the guild perk procs healing more than the dammage they get, nor i saw a full tank fearing, rooting, pushing, pulling and impeding to act half the damm opposite team while they withstand all they throw him, nor i saw a tank holding the fang for almost half match, nor i saw only one tank holding alone codex versus almost half enemy team while the help arrives.
Yes, you could meassure the warrior utility only by the dps they dish.
Sure, clorolocks with 3 mins cooldown skills used, ask youself why do you see them, maybe because it's the only way for a mage to live more than 3 seconds? do you really that the clorolock would not prefer a viable dps spec to use in pvp instead of a mage-tank one with very low dps and burst?
But the problem is when you have 3-4 gap closers, or even worse, unlimited gap closes. what's the counter to it?, have a dps mage 3 or 4 defensive skills to use versus your gap closers?
Pd: you could also walk to the target, not only charge, stun him and killed him in the next 1.5 seconds before jumping to the next one to kill him in the next 1.5s to ....
Bookmarks