Would love the option to p2pf2p
Would love the option to p2pf2p
Oh, how the mighty has fallen.
Since Hartsman left and Daglar took over I started to be skeptical to a full blown despise the current situation of the game.
It's not a game problem but a leadership problem. Yes, I'm looking at the creative director and the producer on this one.
Account Cancelled 03/10/2013
0 Months paid game time remaining.
Bring the fun back into Rift.
If you want to continue that analogy your use of PvP as an indicator is akin to the Dr. saying "you have a fever, it's probably just the flu, go home and get some bed rest." While ignoring all the other issues that show you the patient has bacterial meningitis and needs serious treatment to avoid death.
Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorius triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat.
What if, after F2P comes out, you stop paying a sub fee and instead pay something like a one-time $10 for a new soul that you get forever? Overall, have you lost money or gained money compared to what you used to pay?
I seriously doubt Trion devs are just so amazingly awesome that as soon as F2P hits, they're going to start churning out wads of new souls which you will be forced to buy all of to compete.
I understand the wariness and I've never liked the idea of micro transactions myself, but for all the bad things I could say about Trion, they do genuinely try to listen to their community and many of the devs play the game, so it's not like they would look forward to paying micro transactions to compete either. However, they know something that many of us don't and that's the perspective of being a human being whose paycheck is tied to success in a brutally competitive industry.
Their decisions can't always be about the players, including themselves as players, first. Sometimes they just have to pay the bills.
After taking some time to let this sink in further I do not feel this is the end of rift or the sky is falling. However knowing you planed to go to f2p and still selling us the yearly deal is shady at best and I am displeased with that as you should have known it would have affected many of our decisions on whether or not to buy the year deal and im sorry but converting my remaining 500 plus days to credit is not encouraging since I may not want anything your selling in your store.
Sure I might want something but not having a choice I do feel a bit cheated or forced into this situation and it leaves a sour taste in my mouth. That being said I will still continue to support you and am willing to give your f2p a chance, hell I still have a active eq2 sub and have been with them for 5 years plus. But you need to realize how this looks to some of your customers and honestly the right thing to do imo is to offer refunds to those who wish it (I am not one of them but still a gesture of good faith/intent if you will)
Also I can not stress enough that without a monthly amount of credit with a sub your current sub model is no where near worth 15 dollars, some of the perks can be seen as nice but its not enough, even just 5 dollars worth of credit for a 15 dollar sub would be fine imo since it would allow people who wish to support you via a sub the option to do so while feeling like we can save our credits for items without spending more or if we want it now add a lil more money we can to get it right away.
Just my 2cp on the matter
Last edited by Xillean; 05-15-2013 at 06:29 AM.
Myrmidon Xillean Tormeng, Lord of War
Dimensions: Planar Study Spec: 61/10/5
PA: 900 | Score: 11120 | Tradeskills: All Grandmastered
4/4 GP | 4/4 DH | 5/5 GSB | 5/5 RoS Conqueror | 11/11 HK | 2/4 RotP | 1/8 ID
Characters: Xillean R90, Phantasmal R72, Eylisa R68, Kattie R74
Okay onto suggestions because I do not want to appear like a complete negative nancy. Daglar have you considered a true p2p/f2p? This would include the following...
1. Giving a certain amount of store currency for your subscription.
2. Giving new souls for an active subscriptions.
I actually believe 2 makes sense business wise. Let me explain. We get that you are not dumb. You know that the point of the f2p model is to try and get players to pay more than a subscription would cost. That said the subscription as recurring has value as it is a steady and consistent revenue stream where f2p can be spikey as all hell. With NW nd ESO on the horizon you want to have something in place to encourage people not to game hop. I have been speaking a lot of people and it is not what is being done but HOW it is being done that is pissing people off. A common refrain I am hearing is "yeah NW is f2p BUT it is f2p from the beginning and I was bait and switched on a year long sub when I bought it."
Sometimes your bluntness can be a two edged sword and your admission that this transition was known before you got people locked in on one year subs has caused A LOT of angst.
Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorius triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat.
what does free2play mean?
This couldn't be more wrong. The game is switching from sub based to F2P. If you've ever played both kinds of MMOs you'd realize just how big a change that is. Sure, some people don't mind either one but others paid a pretty hefty subscription based on the knowledge that Rift was subscription based and many of those would not have subscribed had they known that Rift would be going F2P or they would've only subscribed up through the date it would go F2P. It's the fact that Trion isn't offering refunds (or even providing them after being asked) that's so upsetting to so many people.
Avatar by Rotaken on deviantART.
Because some people paid for years of subscription time in advance as an investment in the security of Rift staying sub based and Trion isn't wanting to refund that money now that they're changing the pricing model. I don't care if Trion wants to go F2P... that's fine with me. Just give me back my money so I can leave without that bitter aftertaste of betrayal.
Avatar by Rotaken on deviantART.
Hahaha...that's pretty much what happened too.
You read the PvP forum, I'm sure you've seen it all. People practically got on their knees and begged for improvements/new content etc.
Oh well, too late now.
Archeage is going to flop next. Some really bad reviews out there.
This REX thing is what worries me a lot.
If I understand well, this is the same than in GW2.
People buy REX with real money, sell REX ingame for pp. But this is not at a constant and garanteed rate. You will need people ingame willing to buy your REX at a decent price.
On GW2 there were many people selling, but no people buying because ingame money was very scarce.
What I fear is REX selling for very low price in PP because not many players got thousand of pp to buy these REX things. So for the few people rich in pp things would be good, but for people who want to have more pp via REX, I think this will cost them a fortune in real money.
So when people say, buy REX with your ingame pp and you will not have to pay the cash shop with real money, this is true only for a minority of players.
Last edited by Mordrahan; 05-15-2013 at 05:18 AM.
Dimensions on Brisesol : Domaine Imari (Mordrahan) / Centre de recherches (Mordrahan) / Laboratoire glaciaire (Mordrahan) / Last hope (Aislyn) / Le refuge du Corbeau Rouge (Kasora) / Kelari spirit (Asri) / Ghost ship (Syel) / A la vie, à la mort (Sadar) / Le chemin de l'harmonie (Sadar) / Temple Solaire (Sadar) / Refuge de montagne (Sadar)
I would have preferred if Trion implemented an increased subscription fee than go F2P. The people you want to keep don't want to spend money on gimmicky rubbish, they want content.
Dunsparrow.com - Rogue Tactics and Strategy | GM of <Negative Ghostrider> recruiting! | FT: 5/4 | EE: 6/5
Bookmarks